Since our books are now sorted by color, I spend less time picking things to read before bedtime. I just think, "I'll have a green one." Which is how I started reading The Skeptic's Guide to the Paranormal. The author, Lynne Kelly, is an Australian science teacher with the best possible attitude for a proselytizing skeptic which is basically, "It would be really cool if ghosts and levitation and telepathy existed, but sadly, there's just no evidence for them. Worse yet, most of the supposed evidence is outright fraud. Believe me, I'm just as disappointed as you are."
One of the few examples that isn't fraud, but just an interesting phenomenon, is spontaneous human combustion. Although it's not spontaneous. Kind of the opposite. In fact, you have to be dead or at least deeply unconscious for it to happen at all. It seems to be the result of a grotesque wicking effect in which a slow-burning article of clothing or furniture draws the fat out of your body and burns like the wick of a greasy, human candle, eventually reducing your body to ash while leaving nearby surroundings (and less fatty body parts like feet and hands) unscorched.
Kelly also describes how paranormal beliefs are reinforced by our tendency to interpret evidence selectively, remembering only positive results and seeing false patterns in randomness. She illustrates this point with a bravura interpretation of Kubla Khan, which not only predicts the war in Afghanistan but reveals exactly where Bin Laden is hiding.
Coleridge's poem is famously incomplete, but I was still surprised that all the versions I found on the Web were missing the section in which the author falls into despair, immortal but frozen in time, ironically trapped inside the paradise he spent his life seeking. Then I realized I was thinking of the song Xanadu by Rush.
Being a Rush fan is pretty much being a nerd and since nerds are now cool, Rush is finally hanging with the cool kids. Yes, the Ayn Rand fixation was almost as tiresome as Rand's novels themselves, but Rush was all about stuff that nerdy teenagers found worth thinking about: technology, freewill, science. The tempo changes were sometimes hard to follow, but what they were saying was always clear and interesting (unlike many of their more proggy brethern who drifted off into vague space imagery).
Rush is the secret nerd handshake. The best research I ever did was a portrait of IT culture for Microsoft. I have a copy of the tape that I still watch today and think, "These are my people. This is my tribe." One of my favorite interviews was with the IT director at a cable network in New York. We were talking about art and music and he mentioned a list of bands, including Rush. I said, "Rush?" He tilted his head to look at me over his glasses, "You like Rush?" It was as if he'd opened the bottom drawer of his desk and pulled out a bottle of bourbon and two glasses. "I was in an all-Rush cover band. To me, their music is like beautiful code. Tight. Clean." We both nodded, kicking back at La Villa Strangiato, thirty floors above Times Square.
But music is the secret handshake for almost every teen culture, not just nerds. In another interesting green book, Snoop, Sam Gosling describes how undergraduates consistently choose to talk about music much more than any other topic when trying to get to know one another. He then correlates musical genre preferences with actual personality measures in order to assess which types of music actually tell you something true about the people who listen to it. Based on the resulting chart, it seems safe to say that a shared love of Rush probably does reveal deeper similarities than a shared love of, say, Michael Jackson. Though he could tell you something about spontaneous human combustion.

Awesome post, although some might argue that Rand's novel's are more a treatise on objectivism than just entertainment ;)
Posted by: Charles Frith | November 09, 2008 at 08:27 PM
My impression is that each of them is a thousand treatises on objectivism which happen to be bound in a single cover.
It also seems she has a lot of nerd fans. I wonder if it's because she feeds their/our "I should be able to dominate the world with my mind" fantasies.
Posted by: Jeffre Jackson | November 10, 2008 at 09:27 AM
Hypothesis confirmed: Rush IS a secret handshake.
Before reading this post I had never heard of the band. Today I was also talking about art and music with a client and he also mentioned a list of bands, including Rush.
From that moment on, the conversation was only about my conversion to Rush:
How I had to start with Moving Pictures.
That appreciating Geddy Lee's voice may take time.
And he described the last concert they gave in Ahoy ("Great atmosphere, awful acoustics.").
Now, if you excuse me, Moving Pictures has finished downloading. If I must believe you all, my new life will start right.. now.
Posted by: Camiel | November 11, 2008 at 02:11 PM
Not to be pernickety but I always viewed objectivism as a way to dominate my mind with my mind. A problem for those of us who are easily distracted.
World domination I'll leave to others more suitable to the task ;)
Posted by: Charles Frith | November 11, 2008 at 10:16 PM
I think it's a tossup between starting with Moving Pictures or Permanent Waves. And you may be disappointed in any case. I think Rush imprints better on teens, who are hormonally suited to word domination.
Posted by: Jeffre Jackson | November 12, 2008 at 04:48 AM
What is the deal with world domination, guys?
btw, Jeffre, did you tell the photographer that we don't eat our herring by the tail in Amsterdam?
Posted by: Camiel | November 13, 2008 at 02:19 PM
Yes, in fact, we had to ask specifically for them to leave the tails on. (I usually have it cut up with onion and pickle. Sometimes in a broodje.) But he wanted the iconic eating by the tail shot.
Posted by: Jeffre Jackson | November 18, 2008 at 03:05 AM